|
UFO REVELATION 10
Dr.
Barry H. Downing
UFOS
AND CONSERVATIVE PROTESTANTISM: PART 2
THE
FALLEN ANGEL THEORY
While
the dominant theme of conservative Protestant UFO theology is that
UFOs are demonic, a second view is that they are “fallen angels.”
At first glance, there might not appear to be much difference
between the two theories: both are bad news, pick your poison. But
if we carefully explore the “fallen angel theory,” we will see
that it opens no small Pandora’s Box for the demonic theory, and
perhaps for biblical theology as a whole. Furthermore, it would
appear that the scientific evidence fits the “fallen angel”
theory better than the “demonic” theory.
One
of the main proponents of the fallen angel theory is Chuck Missler,
who along with Mark Eastman, is author of the book Alien
Encounters: The Secret Behind the UFO Phenomenon
(1997). Missler gets high marks from Dolan and Zabel for his
knowledge of the scientific evidence for the UFO mystery. [Patrick
Heron, in books such as The Return of the
Antichrist and the New World Order(2011),
likewise believes Genesis 6 offers important end times clues in
regard to fallen angels, and their connection to “the beast” of
Revelation. There is at this time no firm agreement among
conservative authors concerning how the “Nephilim” and fallen
angels of Genesis 6 are to be understood, but there is considerable
ongoing discussion.]
Dolan
and Zabel say “Charles (Chuck) Missler is one of the world’s
leading Christian ufologists. He is a graduate of the United States
Naval Academy, Air Force flight training, and holds a UCLA Masters
Degree in Engineering. He also knows as much about UFOs as most
non-Christian ufologists. He is well informed about their history,
the cover-up, and specific cases. He knows about the testimony from
astronauts, radar controllers, and jet pilots. He simply explains
UFOs and aliens through the lens of Biblical interpretation as
inter-dimensional beings that have a physical reality.” (A.D., p.
255)
The main advantage of
the fallen angel theory over the demonic theory is that it accepts
the physical nature of the UFO phenomenon with ease, rather than
trying to dismiss it, as Bates and the other demonic theory writers
generally try to do.
The
key text for Missler is Genesis 6 which Missler quotes at length:
“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the
earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw
the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of
all which they chose……There were giants in the earth in those
days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the
daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became
mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” (Genesis 6:1, 2, 4,
Missler, p. 205)
Missler points out
that most ancient translations called the sons of God angels,
especially the Greek translation of the Old Testament, the
Septuagint, which was the resource used by New Testament writers.
These few verses from Genesis seem to be a sparse basis for a strong
link between the Bible and modern UFOs. But there is further
non-canonical evidence that Missler finds compelling.
“The
Book of Enoch also
clearly treats these strange events as involving angels. Although
this book was not considered a part of the ‘inspired’ canon, the
Book of Enoch was venerated by both rabbinical and early Christian
authorities from about 200 B.C. through about A.D. 200 and is useful
to authenticate the lexicological usage and confirm the accepted
beliefs of the period. The Biblical passage refers to supernatural
beings [Missler’s italics] intruding upon
the planet Earth. (There are alternative interpretations of this,
which we will examine shortly.)” (Ibid)
Missler then goes
on to make several connections in the Genesis text. He points out
that the Hebrew word “Nephilim” translates “the fallen ones,”
and by mating with human women, the angels produced “unnatural
offspring, the Nephilim, were monstrous and they have been
memorialized in the legends” and myths of every ancient culture,
including the “demigods” of ancient Greece.
Missler
has a heading, “The Gene Pool Problem,” based on Genesis 6:9,
“These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect
in his generations, and Noah walked with God.” The perfection in
generations, says Missler, is a genetic statement. “This term is
used of physical
blemishes, suggesting that Noah’s genealogy was not tarnished by
the intrusion of the fallen angels. It seems that this adulteration
of the human gene pool was a major problem on the planet Earth, and
apparently Noah was among the few left who were not thus
contaminated.” (p. 207)
Missler
begins chapter 10, “The Return of the Nephilim,” with this
biblical reference from the words of Jesus, “And as it was in the
days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.”
(p. 203) The flow of divine history for Missler seems to be that the
fallen angels created genetic and moral problems before the flood of
Noah, and Jesus suggested that there would be another “Noah” time
before his second coming. Since many modern UFO abductions seem to
involve the taking of sperm samples, and removal of eggs from female
abductees, we may have the fallen angels back, doing some kind of
interbreeding again. That might mean the second coming of Christ is
near.
Through
the rest of his book, Missler draws on UFO writers like Jacques
Vallee and John Keel, who focus on the deception and “trickster”
dimension of the UFO phenomenon, and in this sense he is in unity
with the “demonic” theory proponents like Wilson, Weldon, Dailey
and Bates. There is concern about being under a “strong delusion,”
and being taken in by false Christs, and the antichrist.
But
Missler is aware that his view is different from the demonic view.
“Most students of the Bible tend to assume that the demons of the
New Testament are equivalent to the fallen angels. Angels, however,
seem to have the ability to materialize, etc. (that is, except those
which are presently bound in Tartarus). In contrast, the demons seem
desperate to seek embodiment. Angels and demons seem to be quite
different creatures.” (p. 213)
Gary
Bates, well aware that the “fallen angel” theory does not fit
well with the demonic theory, has a long discussion at the end of his
book, in which he says, “even among Christians, the meaning of this
passage is sometimes hotly debated. There are probably four major
views regarding the expression ‘sons of God’ in Genesis 6, with
some surprising connections to UFOlogy. “ (Bates, p. 351) The
views include the fallen angel view, the descendents of Seth, kings
of the earth seen as gods, or humans possessed by demonic fallen
angels. Bates does not openly dispute Missler, but by offering
several alternatives, he weakens the fallen angel view.
Of
course Bates is well aware that those like Erich von Daniken, and
Zechariah Sitchin, have used the Genesis 6 text to argue that space
aliens have been involved in a breeding program, directing the
development of human life on earth. (p. 350)
THE
FALLEN ANGEL THEORY: SOME OBSERVATIONS
The
fallen angel theory has some advantages over the demonic theory, in
that it explains the physical nature of UFOs better, and the
suggestion of abduction UFO researchers like Budd Hopkins and David
Jacobs that the aliens are involved in some type of genetic or cross
breeding experimentation with humans seems somewhat consistent with
the fallen angel theory.
The
“disconnect” between the fallen angels and modern abductions with
sexual content is that the fallen angels in Genesis saw that “the
daughters of men were fair,” and took them as wives for what seem
to be normal human reasons—the joy of sexual union. In modern UFO
cases, there are rarely reports of sexual unions, but rather
instruments are used to extract sexual material from humans, and
perhaps use this material in some type of incubation device. Sexual
pleasure does not seem to be part of the story. (There are rare
stories of sexual union with aliens, as in the case of Brazilian
farmer Antonio Villas Boas who in October of 1957 reported being
abducted from his tractor, taken aboard a UFO where he had sexual
union with a beautiful, but not quite human, woman.)
Missler
also describes these fallen angels as “supernatural,” and as I
have already said, I believe that eventually Protestants will see
that the concept of the supernatural needs further study.
Supernatural is not a biblical word, nor is there anything the
“fallen angels” do in Genesis 6 to prove they are supernatural,
whatever that word may mean to Missler. For contrast consider the
angel that appeared to Gideon; the angel made consuming fire come
from the tip of his staff, and then ”the angel of the Lord vanished
from his [Gideon’s] sight.” (Judg. 6:21). Or again in the case
of the angel appearing to Manoah and his wife, after Manoah prepares
an offering, “when the flame went up toward heaven from the altar,
the angel of the Lord ascended in the flame of the altar while Manoah
and his wife looked on; and they fell on their faces to the ground.”
(Judg. 13:20) The Genesis 6 “sons of God” show none of these
signs. In addition, there is no UFO reported in the Genesis 6
passage, so connecting this passage to UFOs is very tenuous, to say
the least. Furthermore, I do not think that the Missler argument
that the flood of Noah served to get rid of a bad gene pool fits well
with the Parable of Wheat and Tares of Jesus. Jesus seems to say,
and modern DNA science would suggest, that the whole human race has a
gene pool that is contaminated by a drive to dominate, which Jesus
sees as a Satanic drive. In fact, it is the drive to dominate that
leads Caiaphas and Pilate to crucify Jesus.
The
Missler book was published in 1997, almost 30 years after mine, but
like Dailey, there is no mention of my book, either to approve of my
book, or refute it. Missler clearly knows his Bible well, and
therefore even if he had not read my book, he would know that the
“pillar of cloud and fire” seems very much like a UFO, but I find
no comment on it in his book. In fact, Moses is mentioned only twice
in his whole book, and the key to the Jewish faith is not Genesis
6:1-4, but rather the Exodus. That is where the core of Jewish
revelation occurs. The fallen angel theory in Missler’s hands
seems very much to strain at gnats (Genesis 6:1-4), and then pretends
there is no camel in the living room. ( Exodus 13:21,22; sorry about
the mixed metaphor.) I do not know why Missler did not simply argue
for a dualism, that some UFOs may carry fallen angels, while other
UFOs may be a sign of the presence of Christ and his angels, who for
the present time, are willing to let the fallen angels torment planet
earth, to lead us to repentance. Missler is well aware of the
physical nature of the “good angels” in Genesis. (p. 211) But
he does not even speculate on the possibility that some UFOs might
carry the angels of God.
I
suspect that the fallen angel theory makes some conservative
Protestants like Gary Bates nervous on the grounds that people who
are not Christian are more likely to see the von Daniken view of
Genesis as correct, rather than the Missler view. We live in a
scientific age, an age that doubts the supernatural. It would make
more scientific sense to suppose that if “higher beings” from
somewhere else were involved with human women, perhaps some type of
cross breeding program was under way, not fallen angels “misbehavin.”
It
is not surprising that we find these words on the back cover of
Missler’s book. “Behind the hype, the hoaxes, and the government
disinformation lies a reality so astonishing that the original
publisher was too shocked to follow through with this book.” The
original publishers were probably not so much “shocked” as not
wanting to tar their publishing reputation. In that sense, I very
much see Chuck Missler as a brother.
THE
SATANIC THEORY OF UFOS
So
far as I know, there is no published book with the title “The
Satanic Theory of UFOs.” But as Chuck Missler pointed out, as some
Christians confuse demons and fallen angels, I believe many
conservative Christian writers confuse the Satanic with demons and
fallen angels, although there is of course some overlap.
Satan
or the devil makes a first brief appearance in 1 Chronicles 20:1, as
a being who tempted David, but really only becomes a defined
character in Job. The dating of Job is uncertain, perhaps around 750
B.C. Scholars are not sure when the book reached its current form,
but we need to see that Satan as a testing angel of God came into
Jewish thinking well after the Exodus, which may date before 1200
B.C. In the story of Job, God allows Satan to put Job into a kind
of faith contest, which some religious skeptics see as a primitive
game in which God and Satan make a bet or wager at Job’s expense.
Those of us who are trying to interpret the modern UFO mystery in
light of Scripture seem to be very much in some kind of faith
contest, not of our own creation.
Before
Job, God was often understood to do his own testing. Thus it was the
angel of God who through Moses confronted Pharaoh, and challenged
Pharaoh to let Israel go. The angel of God brought all kinds of
plagues on Egypt, and God tells Moses that “you may tell in the
hearing of your son and of your son’s son how I have made sport of
the Egyptians and what signs I have done among them; that you may
know that I am the Lord.” (Ex. 10:2) Not only does God test the
Egyptians, but Israel is tested in the wilderness. They find
themselves without food and water after crossing the Red Sea, and
they wish they were back in Egypt. Manna drops from the sky, Moses
draws water from a rock. At Sinai, commandments are given, sometimes
Israel disobeys, and is punished. But the whole purpose of God in
the Exodus is explained in these words from Moses to Israel: God “led
you through the great and terrible wilderness, with its fiery
serpents and scorpions and thirsty ground where there was no water,
who brought you water out of the flinty rock, who fed you in the
wilderness with manna which your fathers did not know, that he might
humble you and test you, to do you good in the end.” (Deut. 8:15,
16)
Thus the theme that
God puts us through testing, to reward us in the end (with Promised
Land), is not just a theme from Job, it is an Exodus theme. And the
Apostle Paul confirms this as the theme of those who endure the cross
with Christ. Paul says, “I consider that the sufferings of the
present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be
revealed to us.” (Rom. 8:18) Our lot on earth is testing,
suffering, but our destiny is a heavenly promised land.
Satan
is the angel of God that tests us. We see this at the beginning of
the ministry of Jesus, when we find that “Jesus was led up by the
Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.” (Mt. 4:1)
Jesus was led by the Spirit as Moses was led into the wilderness by
the pillar of cloud and fire, the Exodus UFO. Jesus was led into
testing, as the Jews were led into testing.
And
Jesus taught us to pray, “Lead us not into temptation,” because
this is the world we live in, the Satanic is always here, within the
biological drives of human flesh, programmed as it were by our DNA.
We have a genetic drive to deceive and dominate those around us.
Where
is the Satanic? It is in our desire to put the needs of the flesh
ahead of the needs of the spirit, our bodily desires ahead of the
will of God. We find Jesus is tempted to turn stones to bread, to
meet his biological need for food. But he responds, “Man shall not
live by bread alone.” (Mt. 4:4) The third temptation was to bow
down and worship the devil, and Jesus responded, “Begone, Satan,
for it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God and him
only shall you serve.’” (Mt. 4:10)
Notice
that the first and third temptation seem very related to biological
drives for food first, and then for power and control of territory,
acting on the “territorial imperative” of the “beast” in all
of us. The implication of this temptation is that with his divine
power, Jesus would be the supreme warrior, who could conquer all the
kingdoms of the earth. The temptation of leaping from the pinnacle
of the temple seems to be the yearning of the ego for adoration, to
be worshipped in God’s place, which of course was exactly what made
Satan the adversary of God, and is related to the original sin of
Adam and Eve.
In
light of the biblical understanding of God as not only our creator,
but our tester, whether directly as in the Exodus, or through a
“testing angel like Satan,” how might we view some of our modern
close encounter cases? One of my Christian friends is Rev. Michael
J.S. Carter, author of the book Alien
Scriptures: Extraterrestrials in the Holy Bible
(2005). We have been friends for more than ten years, brought
together by the challenge of understanding the UFO mystery in our
time.
Carter
experienced a series of bedroom visitations over a period of several
months. The first meeting was with a being in a silver suit, and he
had trouble sleeping out of fear the being would return, which it
often did on the date of a full moon. On one occasion when he was in
bed, “I felt a weight on my back as if someone or something was
sitting on it. I could hardly breathe! I was paralyzed and could
not open my eyes. I was terrified and I tried to calm myself by
telling myself that it was just them visiting again. (Even today, I
still have an initial feeling of fear when I get a visit). While
paralyzed with this weight on my back, I was mentally shown a picture
of a being that I can only describe as Spiderman-looking, except that
this being was green and scaley with yellowish cat-like eyes. I
heard a voice whisper in my ear saying, ‘you’re going to be rich
and famous’ (this has yet to happen by the way). I forced myself
up by sheer will and forced open my eyes. To my astonishment, I
watched this being simply walk through my window and outside of the
building. I lived on the 15th
floor at the time.” (p. 27-8)
How are we to
understand a report like this? If as I believe, all things are under
the lordship of Christ, how do I make sense of this story? Carter
and I, by the way, do not agree on how to interpret all the issues
the UFO challenge gives us. But we agree that we need to face what
is going on.
Certainly,
there are aspects of his encounters that seem evil. We might suppose
his fear is a sign that he is dealing with an evil force. But
notice how the Bible describes one divine encounter: “As the sun
was going down, a deep sleep fell on Abram; and lo, a dread and great
darkness fell upon him.” (Gen. 15:12) When the light from the
angel of the Lord shone on the shepherds to announce the birth of
Jesus, “they were filled with fear.” (Lk. 2:9) Thus Carter’s
fear response seems natural, and similar to the human response to
biblical divine encounters.
The
physical nature of the beings might suggest they are “fallen
angels.” Or they might be “space beings” that have abilities
we do not understand. But there is this issue. Those like Whitley
Strieber, author of Communion,
and others who go through multiple contacts--how are we to understand
these modern “chosen people” who are contacted, for good or for
evil, by another reality?
There
is a biblical story of Jacob that may be helpful here. Jacob had
cheated his brother Esau out of his father’s blessing, had been
separated from Esau for years, and was on his way home, seeking
reconciliation with his brother. Jacob sent his wives on ahead one
night, and was left to sleep alone. “And Jacob was left alone; and
a man wrestled with him until the breaking of the day. When the man
saw that he did not prevail against Jacob, he touched the hollow of
his thigh; and Jacob’s thigh was put out of joint as he wrestled
with him. Then he said, ‘Let me go, for the day is breaking.’
But Jacob said, ‘I will not let you go, unless you bless me.’ And
he said, “What is your name?’ And he said, ‘Jacob.’ Then he
said, ‘Your name shall no more be called Jacob, but Israel, for you
have striven with God and with men, and have prevailed.” (Gen.
32:24-28) Jacob’s own conclusion was he had seen God face to face.
But the role of the stranger in the night seems very much like a
Satanic role, for the being is clearly in an adversarial role with
Jacob. The Jacob story appears before Satan became a figure in Jewish
literature. But the theme of Jacob wrestling is the theme of Job: we
go through bad trials, and are blessed in the end. It is the theme
of the Exodus, wilderness journey, followed by Promised Land, and the
story of Jesus, crucified, and raised from the dead.
I
would not want to go through what Michael Carter has gone through in
his close encounters. Yet it seems clear that these encounters have
shaped who Michael now is, as Jacob’s encounter reshaped not only
his self understanding, with a new name, but it became the name of
the whole people of God. The alien being promised Michael that he
would be “rich and famous,” which Michael is not. Is this Satan,
the father of lies, speaking to Michael? Or might the alien promise
refer to the Resurrection to come, when our true identity in Christ
is revealed?
Missler
better than those who argue for the demonic point of view understands
the complexity we face. He says, “Because of Satan’s sinister
nature, many people naturally believe that his physical appearance is
evil. However, because of Satan’s supernatural ability to change
his external form, he could take on a very pleasing, attractive, and
even reassuring external form while remaining, in essence, the most
evil entity in the universe! It is interesting that when Antonio
Villas-Boas was abducted in 1957, he described the female alien
entity he encountered as the ‘most beautiful’ creature he had
ever seen!” (p. 245)
How
then are we to read the Michael Carter experience, since one of his
aliens had a “Spiderman” appearance? If the aliens are
beautiful, does this mean they are Satanic, but if ugly, angelic?
Should we link ugly aliens to Christ, who in the prophecy of Isaiah
has “no form or comeliness that we should look on him, and no
beauty that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by
men…as one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we
esteemed him not.” (Is. 53:2.3)
Or in the end of the
day, do we have to look deeper than appearance to understand the
“reality”
behind the appearance? Carter goes on to say that he was eventually
led to a form of healing called “Reiki,” and that his asthma, an
affliction since childhood, lessened. Even more, he was convinced
that he had healing gifts, and enrolled in seminary in New York, and
became a hospital chaplain.
I
know much of Carter’s story will seem “New Age” and “occult”
in many of its dimensions to Christian conservatives. But I think we
need to be careful to distinguish what may be an outpouring of the
Holy Spirit in our time on one hand (Acts 2:15-18), and the occult
on the other hand. One interesting aspect of Carter’s experience
is he is black, and he says, “I cannot tell you how many books and
articles I have read which indict the so-called ‘Grays’ or
‘Reptillians’ as sinister or evil, while embracing the blond
blue-eyed ‘Swedes’ or ‘Pledians’ as benevolent and loving.
These portrayals may or may not be true. Intergalactic racism is a
very real phenomenon in my humble opinion and needs to be called out
when it is evident. After all, we humans can be pretty xenophobic
when it comes to the so-called ‘other.’” (p. 29)
Speaking
of welcoming the other, the stranger, where has the voice of the
church been? Jesus said, “I was a stranger, and you welcomed me.”
(Mt. 25:35) Neither the church, nor the world, has welcomed our UFO
strangers. Might we be entertaining angels unawares? Or at the
very least, God’s testing angels?
AN
ANGEL OF LIGHT—A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER
The point at which
the danger of UFOs and the Satanic is clearly evident is in relation
to what Dolan and Zabel call the “Breakaway Group.” They say,
“When Disclosure finally comes in the future, it will reveal the
existence of a group that has pulled the strings on the UFO secret
for years. It probably has a name, one that we are unaware of now,
that will be exposed and become infamous. That name is probably not
the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Free Masons,
or even Majestic.” (p. 94) Whatever the name of the group, it
will probably be international in scope, in some sense beyond the
reach of any of our elected officials, including the President of the
United States.
Dolan and Zabel say,
“Let us hope that those people in the Breakaway Group who are
dealing with the presence of the Others now and have been for so many
years, are doing so in a way that is responsible to humanity as a
whole. For at the present time, we have no way of knowing whether
this is so, and no way of holding them accountable to the people.”
(p. 95)
If
my imaginary alien Zorg does exist, in some real sense, and a secret
human group is in verbal contact with the aliens, then the question
is: What have the aliens offered to give us?
And
what do they expect back in return, if anything? And what will we do
with any “alien gifts?”
Richard
Dolan is one of several UFO researchers who believe some aliens
either look naturally human, or can make themselves look human. This
means the aliens could infiltrate key positions in society and we
would not even know it. (Dolan and others responded to the question,
“The aliens that look just like us or make themselves to look just
like us—how integrated do you think they are in our society?”
“The Big Questions,” MUFON UFO Journal,
July 2011, p. 8.) The biblical view of
angels is that they can seem very human, and can live in our society
without being noticed. The three men who visited Abraham and Sarah
were not known to be angels until after they left. (Gen. 18) The
idea that we might entertain angels unawares assumes angels look
human. (Heb. 13:2) When angels are distinguished from humans, it is
often by their clothing. (Matt. 28:3; Acts 1:10) Thus we have a
right to suppose that the angels of God may be living among us, but
without our knowledge. Thus the conclusion of some UFO researchers
that modern “aliens” are also living among us is shocking to
Christians only because we have stopped believing the angels of God
are still doing what they did in biblical times. But might we have a
mixture of good and fallen angels living among us? If so, how would
we tell the difference?
Those
like Dr. Stephen Greer are sure that the aliens have given us the
knowledge of anti-gravitational power, and with knowledge of this
power, we can now run our technological society with pollution free
energy. We no longer have to power modern culture with fossil fuels.
Some researchers believe the “Breakaway Group” is holding back
the secrets of this new power because they are so invested in profits
from oil.
The second issue is
that the “abduction phenomenon” indicates that the aliens have
tremendous psychological power, they can take over the minds of
abductees, they can make the abductees forget their experience. The
aliens can control our psychological “reality,” and turn it into
fantasy.
What
this means is, humans with alien technology, and alien paranormal
powers, could control the world, and we would have no power to
resist.
Here
is the danger, it is the danger the Devil offered to Jesus to control
all the kingdoms of the world “if you will fall down and worship
me.” (Mt. 4:9) As I have shown in UFO REVELATION 8, our animal
drive to dominate is so much a given in human politics that I do not
believe any secret “Breakaway Group” would be able to resist the
temptation to use their power in an evil way. And any aliens/fallen
angels who offered humans power to rule the whole world would very
much be serving in the role of Satan.
The
Apostle Paul understood that there are false apostles who disguise
themselves as apostles of Christ, “And no wonder, for even Satan
disguises himself as an angel of light.” (2 Cor. 11:14) The
original temptation of Eve in the garden was to “upgrade her
power,” to be more like God. The serpent said of the forbidden
fruit, “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be
opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Gen. 3:5)
If Zorg and his friends offer power to a secret group, which would
enable that group to control the world, I cannot imagine any human
group turning down the offer. Only if the Servant voice of Christ
was in the Breakaway Group could the offer be resisted. And I
suspect that whatever the name of the Breakaway Group, it follows the
laws of the flesh, the spirit of antichrist, not the laws and spirit
of Christ. But the bottom line for all Christians is not to have the
right “theory” about the aliens, what we need to know is what is
going on. We need our modern Pharaohs to confess the truth. If they
do not willingly confess, then I hope God forces a confession from
them. I believe it is in God’s power to force such a confession.
He forced a confession from Pharaoh in Egypt, and God can make sport
of our modern Pharaohs. I hope all Christians long to see the glory
of God as UFO REVELATION unfolds.
Dr.
Barry H. Downing
July
31, 2011
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1574&Itemid=9 Part 1
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1593&Itemid=9 Part 2
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1593&Itemid=9 Part 3
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1621&Itemid=9 Part 4
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1621&Itemid=9 Part 5
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1646&Itemid=9 Part 6
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1659&Itemid=9 Part 7
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1662&Itemid=9 Part 8
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1665&Itemid=9 Part 9
|
Home 
