|
UFO
REVELATION 8
Dr.
Barry H. Downing
BIOLOGY,
DOMINANCE, CHRIST, ANTICHRIST
Sociobiology
is the relatively new science that studies the genetic consequences
of the social behavior of a species. It relies on the data collected
from the study of animal social behavior, especially of mammals, a
science called ethology. What is clear throughout all species is
that there is a system of dominance in every species, those at the
top of the society are called Alpha, those at the bottom Omega.
(Useful books in the field include: Edward O. Wilson, Sociobiology:
The New Synthesis, 1975; Richard Dawkins, The
Selfish Gene, 1976; Konrad Lorenz, On
Aggression, 1966; Robert Ardrey, The
Territorial Imperative, 1966; The
Social Contract, 1970.)
Gaining
dominance has rewards related to both food and sex. The dominant
males and females usually have first choice of the food that is
available, and in some cases, the dominant female will protect food
for her offspring from other adults of the species. Among most
species, a struggle for food means a struggle for territory, and
therefore there are often “turf wars” within species to control
what Robert Ardrey calls The Territorial
Imperative.
Among most species,
females do not have to compete for sex, but the males do.
“The
maturing male of whatever species does not have it good. The
sexually maturing male elephant must leave his mother and join the
male band, with rank order already established, where he will find
himself omega.” (Ardrey, The Social
Contract, 1974, p. 141) Most males as they
mature will have to find a way to gain dominance within their social
group in order to have sexual access to females. Usually this
involves some kind of violence, head butting, clawing, biting, or
goring with horns. Death is sometimes the reward for the losers in
this struggle.
The
sociobiological explanation for this behavior is that the weak males
are weeded out through this process, and only the most fit males—fit
to survive—become sexually active. It is their genes that get
passed on to the females. Thus violence is one of the main means by
which nature controls the quality of the genes that pass from
generation to generation. Violence within a species, directed at its
own kind, is common, and is related to the dietary advantage that
comes with controlling territory, and the sexual advantage that comes
usually to the dominant male.
It
is interesting to look at the parable of the Wheat and Tares as a
creation parable. Jesus tells of a man who sows good seed in his
field, as we would expect God to do, “but while men were sleeping,
his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.”
(Mt. 13:25) Thus life as we find it is a mix of good and evil. If
we think of the sleeping men as angels, the implication is that
angels were present at creation, and it was their job to defend the
earth, and help care for “God’s farm.” The enemy sowing his
seed by night in another man’s field is the classic image of
adultery. But unlike the serpent seducing Eve in the Garden, there
seems to be no seduction here. The “enemy” just plants his evil
seed by night. When the discovery is made that wheat and weeds are
growing together, it is found there is no way to pull up the weeds
without hurting the wheat in the process. (vs. 29) The solution is
to let both grow until harvest, until judgment day. The parable
implies that we humans have good and evil in us, in our very biology.
It is mixed in our very roots. This does not mean our bodies are
“all bad.” But it does mean our biological nature is corrupted,
we have a dark side, a Satanic side, which we could say in scientific
terms is planted in our DNA. If we were hopelessly bad, like Sodom,
we would have been destroyed by God. But we have good in us, along
with the bad, and the gospel is Christ has come to redeem the good in
us, by putting his Holy Spirit in us. Our calling as Christians is
to have the Holy Spirit in us rule over the Satanic laws of dominance
in us. Christ will lead us on a new Exodus, not from Egyptian
slavery, but from slavery to our corrupted biology, which is
controlled by a spirit of domination.
What
about women and the struggle for power? In the animal world, females
struggle for dominance too, but the stakes are somewhat less high.
Females usually do not have to compete for sex. In a flock of
chickens, the females will establish a “pecking order.” The
dominant chicken will be able to peck all the hens below her in the
order, and none will peck her back. She is Alpha. The Beta chicken
will peck all below her, but not peck Alpha. The Omega chicken gets
pecked by all, and can peck none back. I have seen the Omega chicken
in a flock, and often it is not a pretty sight. Many feathers are
missing, there are often open sores, this is the most likely chicken
in the flock to die first.
Maturing
males of a species will look for ways to displace the dominant males.
Ardrey makes the comment, “But if the maturing male does not know
as much as he thinks he knows, the established male may not either.
As ignorance is the property of the young, habituation is the
property of the adult.” (Ibid, p.
156) As we think of the recent revolutions in Egypt and Libya, we
have witnessed the long established adult male leader being
overthrown by the young. While most agree that the “aging leader”
in each case is “oppressive,” there is anxiety that the “new
order” may not know what it is doing. But the message from
ethology is the political struggle for power and dominance is all
very natural.
From
a political point of view, conservatives are those who now hold
power, liberals are the ones wanting to be in power, but are not.
Among humans money is one of our most basic forms of power: George
Soros, Donald Trump and Warren Buffett are famous for having money.
The poor are famous for not having money, and for “always being
with us” as Jesus said. (Mt. 26:11)
Technology
is a special source of human power, rather than horns, teeth and
claws. Guns and nuclear weapons give power to those who have these
weapons, humans will be in a position to dominate those who have no
weapons, or who have technologically less powerful weapons. In so
far as science helps build more successful weapons, science too is a
form of power which enables one country to dominate another, and
technological success in the market place helps one company dominate
“market share” over another.
Something
like “arena behavior” can be observed among certain species. The
arena serves as a breeding ground, and dominant males hold territory
in the arena, and only those males holding territory in the arena
have sexual access to females. Females will ignore those males
outside the arena who cannot control territory in the arena. Human
sports frequently occur in an arena. Sports are the human
ritualization of nature’s biological drive to dominate. The
biggest day in American television each year is Super Bowl Sunday,
the day the teams with the Alpha Males of football face off to see
who is the champion, the dominate team. The winners gain money, and
if the rumors are to be believed, sexual access to females.
Bulls
have their strength in their “bull neck;” NFL linemen usually
have a bull neck; defensive linemen may make a “bull rush” on the
quarterback. We worship “dominance,” we worship winners, not
losers.
THE
ALPHA GOD
“’I
am the Alpha and the Omega,’ says the Lord God, who is and who was
and who is to come, the Almighty.” (Rev. 1:8) The God of the
Bible is a strange God. He is almighty, he is the God who can
dominate, and demands to be Alpha. But at the same time, this Alpha
God can choose to be Omega, can choose to be dominated, as we see in
the cross of Christ. Jesus loves the losers, the blind, the lame,
the lepers, those who would never make an NFL roster. Jesus was
sent to the losers, to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. (Mt.
10:6)
The
power of God is sounded at the beginning of the Apostles’ Creed: “I
believe in God the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth.”
Genesis speaks the opening word of our dominant God, “In the
beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Gen. 1:1) The
Gospel of John makes the same claim for Jesus, “without him was not
anything made that was made.” (Jn. 1:3)
The
God of the Exodus insists, “You shall have no other gods before
me.” (Ex. 20:3) Furthermore, this God is not nature, not something
you can turn into an idol of stone or wood. “You shall not make
for yourself any graven image.” (Ex. 20: 4) Religions that worship
nature are false religions. The God of the Jews is Spirit, which
created nature.
In
fact, the God of Moses issues commandments that counteract the drives
we find in nature—killing is forbidden; killing is very natural,
killing is the ultimate sign of victory in nature’s dominance game.
The one who lives is the winner, number one, Alpha. Adultery is
forbidden, taking another man’s wife, or stealing, or using
deception to gain advantage (bearing false witness), the many tricks
that are found throughout the animal kingdom as techniques for
gaining territorial and sexual advantage, are forbidden in the
commandments.
But
the Alphaness of the God of the Exodus is shown in language that
Pharaoh could understand. Pharaoh had ordered the killing of Hebrew
male children at their birth. Moses had escaped, thanks to being
hidden in the bulrushes along the shore of the Nile, only to be
rescued by Pharaoh’s daughter. Years later, when Moses demanded
freedom for Israel in the name of God, plagues came upon the defiant
Pharaoh—flies, frogs, locusts—until finally came the big hammer
blow. The first-born male Egyptian children were killed on Passover
night, and the Hebrew males were spared. The God of Moses could out
kill Pharaoh. At the Red Sea, the pillar of cloud and fire defeated
the chariots of Pharaoh. Egypt got the message, “Let us flee from
before Israel, for the Lord fights for them against the Egyptians.”
(Ex. 14:25) This led to what modern America sees as the very
politically incorrect view that the Jews were God’s chosen people,
a religious idea many in our generation find revolting.
Jesus
never killed anyone, but he in some ways was like the young males of
a species who challenge the establishment leaders, in his case, the
Scribes and Pharisees. He gathered a band of disciples who became
his followers, and he attracted crowds that could number in the
thousands. He could heal the blind, the lame, the deaf, he could
drive out demons. Thus he exhibited an Alphaness over nature, and
over the destructive spiritual powers that could overtake the human
mind. He was eventually seen as a threat to the Roman power
structure in Jerusalem, mainly because he seemed to upset the Jewish
religious and political power structure.
He
sent his disciples out to preach that the kingdom of God was near.
This was a strange message, which still causes debate among Christian
scholars. But finally he was crucified by the Roman authorities.
From the point of view of the God of Moses, Jesus seemed to be a
failure. Surely if Jesus were as he claimed, the Son of God, then he
should have been saved from the cross. The God who killed the
first-born of Egypt, and parted the Red Sea, certainly had the power
to protect Jesus. But he did not. Jesus died, but then on the
third day was raised. This is strange. In Jesus we see that God is
more than power, more than Alpha. In Jesus, the weakness of God, the
Omega side of God, is exposed.
THE
OMEGA GOD
The
Apostle Paul caught the paradox of the Omega God, the God who loses
in the dominance game that Jesus fought with Caiaphas and Pilate.
“For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ
crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to
those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God
and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than men,
and the weakness of God is stronger than men.” (1 Cor. 1:22-25)
The essence of the
spiritual battle that we find in Jesus is that he is in a battle
against the desires of his own biology, his desire for food, power,
success, survival. Over against that, he is seeking the power of God
to heal the sick, the blind, the lame, demand that the rich show
compassion toward the poor, and ordain followers who will maintain
his tradition after his death and resurrection.
Immediately
after his baptism, he is “led by the Spirit” into the wilderness
to be tempted by the devil. The first temptation is to turn stones
to bread, to use his divine power to meet the hunger of his flesh.
Jesus turned down the offer with the words, “Man does not live by
bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.”
(Mt. 4:4) The lesson here is that the word of God, and will of God,
must always take priority over the hungers of the flesh (for food,
sex, status etc.)
The third temptation
is to bow down and worship the devil, and Jesus would be given the
kingdoms of the world. Jesus responded that we are to worship God
alone. What was at stake here? I believe that if Jesus had used his
divine power the way the rulers of this world operate, by fear,
taxes, armies, and oppression, he could have ruled the world.
In
a debate with his opponents Jesus said, “You are of your father the
devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a
murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according
to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” (Jn.
8:44) Throughout the animal kingdom, deception is a strategy for
dominance and success. Sometimes, murder of ones own species is part
of that strategy. Jesus identified all these forms of power seeking
as the work of the devil.
It is worth noting
that the crowd, when given a choice between the release of Jesus, and
Barabbas, elected Barabbas who “had been thrown into prison for
insurrection and murder.”
(Lk.
23:25) The crowd preferred a “liberationist” to Christ. The
crowd of Jews loved the man who wanted to throw the oppressive Romans
out of Jerusalem. Jesus was not that man.
But
what we also need to face here is that in the Exodus, God used the
power of killing, and domination, to defeat Pharaoh. In Jesus we
have a rejection of that kind of power, because it is in a sense the
way of the flesh, the way of the world. This is why the New
Testament really is a New Covenant. The New Covenant was not
established by God out killing his enemies. In the New Testament,
the son of God is killed by his enemies. I do not find it surprising
that many Jews found the God Jesus preached at odds with the God of
Moses. In the Old Testament, the power of God overshadowed his love.
In the New Testament, the love of God overshadows his power,
although in the empty tomb, we see God’s power is still part of our
faith reality. [In The Bible and Flying
Saucers, I make the observation in regard to
UFOs that “we never find the fantastic display of power in the New
Testament that we found in the Old Testament in front of thousands of
witnesses.” ( p. 159)]
The
Apostle Paul understood that we who are in Christ have a Spirit that
is at odds with the desire of the flesh, including our drive to
dominate. This point of view is expressed clearly in Romans 8:1-17,
as well as in Galatians, where he says, “Now the works of the flesh
are plain:
Fornication,
impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife,
jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit, envy,
drunkenness, carousing and the like.” (Gal. 5:19-21) In contrast
the fruit of the Spirit “is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness,
goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.” (5:22,23)
Christians are those who have “crucified the flesh with its
passions and desires.” (Gal. 5:24) We find Jesus speaking
directly to our need to be “born again,” because flesh is flesh,
and spirit is spirit. (Jn. 3:3)
The
biblical people saw the injustice of the strong dominating the weak,
both in the animal world, and its parallel in the human world. The
prophet Ezekiel used images from the shepherd experience to proclaim
the will of God. “Therefore, thus says the Lord God to them:
Behold, I, I myself will judge between the fat sheep and the lean
sheep. Because you push with side and shoulder, and thrust at all
the weak with your horns, till you have scattered them abroad.
I
will save my flock, they shall no longer be a prey, and I will judge
between sheep and sheep.”
(Ez.:
34:20-22)
When Jesus heals the
sick and the lame, when he calls on the rich to share with the poor,
when he condemns the scribes who “devour widows’ houses,” (Mk.
12:40, not unlike modern Wall Street Bankers), Jesus is very much
acting the role of the Good Shepherd. (Jn. 10:11)
Jesus made the
distinction between his kingdom, and the kingdoms of this world, very
clear. On one occasion the mother of James and John came to Jesus,
asking that one sit on his right hand, and one on his left, when
Jesus came into his kingdom. This was worldly politics, in which the
winners expect to share the rewards. Jesus said, “You know that
the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men
exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you; but
whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever
would be first among you must be your slave; even as the Son of man
came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom
for many.” (Mt. 20:25-28)
In
other words, worldly politics is very much the Alpha Game, in which,
driven by the lusts of the flesh, rulers of this world rise to the
top of the pecking order. Jesus calls us not to play Alpha, but
rather to play Omega, to seek not to be at the top of the pecking
order, but rather at the bottom. Jesus is a contradiction in terms,
a servant Lord, and we are called to join him.
Notice
Jesus does not preach a Marxist style “classless society” as
some liberal Christians suppose. True, Jesus has no great love for
the oppressive ruling class at the top of the human pecking order,
whether it be political power in the secular world, or preachers
living in houses with gold faucets. Jesus did not preach a health
and wealth gospel. But at the same time, Jesus does not call for a
revolution to overthrow the oppressors, to bring in a society of
equality, as is often typical of modern liberation theology. Jesus
does not call his followers to a classless society of equality,
rather we are called to join the servant class, the bottom class.
That is the class in which the Holy Spirit of gentleness, kindness
and meekness dwells. Most liberation movements are fueled by envy,
“they have what we should have and it is only just that we take
it.”
In
so far as modern Protestantism has split between liberals and
conservatives, liberals have tended to be guilty of envy,
conservatives of greed, of wanting to hold on to what they have. Both
envy and greed are very natural. But they are not godly motives.
There are two major sins in the Bible: rebellion and oppression.
Rebellion is the basic sin of Adam and Eve in the garden. Oppression
is the sin of Pharaoh as he mistreats the slave nation Israel.
Liberals tend to be guilty of the sin of rebellion; conservatives of
the sin of oppression. Each is usually able to see the sin in the
other side, but not their own. Thus when conservatives hold fast to
their money, their positions of power in the world, or the church,
they are playing Alpha, in worldly terms. When liberals, like young
males in the animal world, attack conservatives who hold power, they
are acting out of rebellion and envy. Liberals are not Alpha, but
want to be. But usually liberals put on the moral white suit of
“justice” to cover their biologically motivated drive for power.
Conservatives usually protect their territory by saying, “It is the
law.” They deny freedom to others in the name of the law. The
extreme forms of both liberals and conservatives are very much caught
up in the world’s power game, they are not interested in hearing
the call of Christ to join the servant class. As I see it, in so far
as they are at war with each other, liberal and conservative
Christians have really joined “the children of darkness.”
There
are some parables of Jesus that suggest the heavenly ideal may be a
classless society, such as the parable of the workers in the
vineyard, who at the end of the day receive the same pay, no matter
how long or how little they worked. (Mt. 20:1-18) But the workers
are paid in the opposite order in which they were hired. As Jesus
explains, “So the last will be first; and the first last.”
(20:18)
What
Jesus is preaching here is an eschatology—our future life in
heaven—in which we will experience not classlessness, but class
reversal. Ordinarily, those who work longest would be paid most, and
be the richest. In this parable those “least deserving” from the
world’s point of view are most deserving from God’s point of
view. The story of Lazarus and the rich man in Luke makes the same
point, that in the life to come, there will be class reversal,
Lazarus will be rewarded. The pecking order of the world will be
reversed. In the resurrection, Spirit will win out over flesh. (Lk.
16:19-31)
The
distinction between liberal and conservative is strikingly clear in
the parable of the Prodigal Son in Luke 15. The younger son is the
liberal in rebellion. By the custom of the day, the oldest son in
the family would inherit the major part of the estate. This is why
Jacob, the second born twin, was so intent on stealing his brother
Esau’s birth right. (Gen. 25:19-34) The younger son would be in
the position of natural envy of his older brother. A liberation
theologian would tell the younger brother that he is the victim of an
oppressive inheritance system, and he should rebel against it.
Since
he has little investment in the future of the family estate, the
prodigal asks for his share of the inheritance, cashes it in, and
heads for a far country where he wastes his money on wild living,
especially sexual promiscuity. The sin of the prodigal is the sin of
rebellion, like Adam and Eve. The younger brother has a fairly
typical liberal profile: he rejects the established order (home), and
has little regard for sexual or financial responsibility.
The
older brother represents a fairly typical conservative profile. He
is hard working and obedient. “Lo, these many years I have served
you, and I never disobeyed your command.”
(Lk.
15:29) But at the same time, there is a sense of resentment about
his obedience, he has not obeyed joyfully, and notes that his father
has not even killed a kid so that he could party with his friends.
The older brother comes off as responsible, but hard hearted, a
frequent conservative profile. He believes in crime and punishment,
not crime and forgiveness. His sin is the sin of oppression, like
Pharaoh in Egypt. Conservatives tend to believe because they “stayed
home with father,” they have the right to condemn the unfaithful
brother, or as I have experienced, condemn anyone who disagrees with
them. In the parable, there is a happy ending for the prodigal, but
not for the older brother. But the older brother could have had a
happy ending if he had repented of his hard heartedness. The two
brothers together, the younger acting out rebellion, and the older
oppression, represent the two sides of the war of the flesh at work,
the biological struggle for dominance. But neither the liberal nor
the conservative brother has the heart of the father, and therefore,
they do not have the heart of Christ, who is one with the Father.
(Jn. 17:22)
The
gospel is that both liberals and conservatives have to repent.
Liberals have to repent of their sin, or they are as good as dead.
(Lk. 15:24) Conservatives have to repent of their hard hearts, or
they will exclude themselves from the joy of the Father’s kingdom.
(Lk. 15:28)
CHRIST
AND ANTICHRIST
It
does not appear that Jesus supposed that his coming would bring to an
end the power politics of the world, that the “laws of the flesh”
would suddenly disappear. Rather, justice for those who took on the
Servanthood of Christ, who lived in his Spirit, would be rewarded not
in this world, but in the world to come. This is why the loss of
eschatology, which I found in my studies at Princeton Seminary, meant
that there was no motivation now to obey the ethics of Jesus. That
is why a Marxist eschatology replaced the eschatology of Jesus in
liberation theology. And perhaps why some conservatives, who
supposedly believed in heaven, so easily bought the false
“prosperity” gospel of modern media preachers.
Jesus
said as he neared the end of his earthly ministry, “In the world
you have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the
world.” (Jn. 16:33) Many will come in the name of Christ, we must
be careful not to be led astray. There will be wars and rumors of
wars, the flesh will still rule this world. “For nation will rise
against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be
famines and earthquakes in various places; all this is but the
beginning of the birth-pangs.” (Mt. 24:7, 8)
And
“wickedness will multiply.” I take this warning to be
inclusive, not only of wickedness in the world of politics, but also
in the church, “most men’s love will grow cold.” (Mt. 24:12)
Dolan and Zabel believe, as do I, that the government of the United
States has been keeping UFO information secret for more than 60
years, and that billions, perhaps trillions of dollars in secret
funds, black budget money, has gone into research regarding UFO
technology. We face the possibility that a Breakaway Civilization,
not our elected officials, now rule the United States. This secret
group has unbelievable power to “multiply wickedness.” And I
fear that the love of Christ in the church has grown so cold that no
Christian voice of protest speaks against this wickedness. Dolan and
Zabel are doing what I believe the church of Christ should be doing,
and is not. A Website like Strong Delusion is doing its best, but in
the modern world of media overload, Strong Delusion has a fairly
quiet voice.
What
is the UFO reality? Is it demonic? Do UFOs carry fallen angels?
These are the views of some conservative Christians. My view, that
UFOs may carry the angels of God has almost no support, from either
conservative or liberal Protestant Christians.
Should
I worry about being taken in by a “strong delusion?” (2 Thes.
2:11) If so, what is the delusion, that UFOs might carry the angels
of God? (Is it wicked of me to hope UFOs are a sign the angels of God
are guarding the earth?) This is hardly a “strong” delusion,
since I am one of the few raising this possibility. Or could it be a
strong delusion that UFOs are demons?
Or
a strong delusion that UFOs are just space guys, here to help give us
new technology?
Paul
raises the possibility that “the lawless one will be revealed.”
This will be by the activity of Satan and “will be with all power
and with pretended signs and wonders.” (2 Thes. 2:9) John sees the
coming of the antichrist. “Children, it is the last hour; and as
you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists
have come; therefore we know that it is the last hour.” (1 Jn.
2:18) Satan, as we see in the temptations of Jesus, is very much on
the side of the flesh, and its laws of domination. In a sense, the
laws of the flesh, the lust to dominate, the lust for sex and power,
for position and prestige, to be at the top of the pecking order, are
very much Satanic characteristics. Therefore they are Anti-Christ.
They are very much part of our current political order, and in no
small part, visible in a corrupt church, worried about its status in
the world. In modern Protestantism, with its liberal and
conservative divisions, with each side saying, “We speak for the
truth of Christ,” both sides are taking an Anti-Christ role. By
taking sides with either the prodigal brother, or the elder brother,
modern Protestants fail to speak for the heart of the Father. I do
not believe that modern divided Protestantism has the theological
faithfulness to deal with the UFO evidence.
And
we do have to worry that some extraterrestrial power might convince
us that they have a god-like status in relation to us, causing us to
worship them, rather than the God of Jesus Christ. If those in
charge of UFO secrets are talking with Zorg (if Zorg exists), is Zorg
the Antichrist? Or a false Christ? One of the questions we need to
ask is: Do UFOs seek to dominate us, as we might expect Satan to do,
following the laws of the flesh? Or do UFOs seem to be carrying out
a servant role in relation to planet earth, which is the Christ role?
Are modern UFOs, like the angels, trying to save us from ourselves?
Or are they trying to enslave us? And how do we weigh the evidence?
How do we get our modern Pharaohs to release the evidence? Or do we
count on God to expose the lies of our modern Pharaohs with a modern
UFO Passover? These are the issues that face us as we consider our
next UFO REVELATION, UFOs and Conservative Protestantism.
Dr.
Barry H. Downing
July
3, 2011
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1574&Itemid=9 Part 1
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1593&Itemid=9 Part 2
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1608&Itemid=9 Part 3
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1621&Itemid=9 Part 4
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1621&Itemid=9 Part 5
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1646&Itemid=9 Part 6
http://thestrongdelusion.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1659&Itemid=9 Part 7
|
Home 
